top of page
Writer's pictureGary Moller

COVID Inquiry Report: Are we Doomed to Repeat a $70 billion Blunder?

Updated: 2 days ago


COVID symptoms

As I skimmed the COVID-19 Inquiry Report, I could not help but feel a sense of disappointment, a deep knot forming in my gut, and a heavy heart. I have not read the whole report, only the summary and news reports like this one in the Woke Media Misinformation Rag, Get Stuffed, which I used to trust, but now I do not.


So, when reading what I have written here, please bear in mind that my reading of the report was cursory, so I may have missed some details. I could only stomach so much.


I was honoured to be one of the speakers for the Safe and Effective Road Show, which painted an entirely contrasting picture to that of the inquiry. You can purchase the replay of the road show, including my presentation.


roadshow banner

The report failed from the start because the Inquiry's Commissioners believed that the vaccine was safe and effective, and never properly explored this matter of heated dispute. They believed, despite a mountain of evidence to the contrary, that other measures, like masking and social isolation, were mostly successful. The Commissioners were unwavering in their belief that the country's COVID response, including the mass vaccination of its population, saved thousands of lives. These are beliefs that hard evidence does not support. These are beliefs that I, and many others, including internationally respected experts, find deeply flawed. The measures taken, such as masking, social distancing, and mass testing with PCR and RATS tests, were either ineffective or fundamentally flawed.


One of the most glaring issues with the report is its one-size-fits-all approach. The New Zealand population is diverse, with varying levels of risk. While the elderly and the infirm were undoubtedly at greater risk, the danger posed to young people was so minimal that crossing the road was a greater threat to their health. Yet, the measures implemented did not reflect this stratification of risk. Insurance industry calculators indicate that most people have been harmed, and many are badly hurt.


Pyramid of harm and death

But the hurt people do not know it was the bioweapon needle that is doing the damage, many two to three years later. They are being ignored and laughed at by dishonest doctors, health officials, and politicians, if they query the safety of the jab. They just get sick randomly from cancers, neurological conditions, heart failure, poor healing, miscarriages, and other things. The health department hides the real cause — damage to people's immune systems by the jab.


Let me ask you this: if the jab was as safe and effective as they still claim, then why did over 11,000 health officials rush to grant themselves vaccine exemptions while mandating it for you and me? Why did not the inquiry address this question? Will the Stage Two Inquiry?


The report fails to acknowledge the crucial role of natural immunity. Healthy and robust people can generate strong natural immunity by catching an infection in the wild. This contributes to herd immunity, and protects the vulnerable within the population. This aspect is completely ignored in the report. I wanted healthy young people, and myself, to volunteer to contract the infection early during 2020, while the infirm and the elderly were protected. This would quickly and safely create herd immunity to protect the elderly and the sick. Instead, the only solutions allowed were lockdowns, masks, and a bioweapon vaccine.


Another point of contention is the myth perpetuated by health officials and experts that the unvaccinated pose a risk to the vaccinated. The opposite is in fact the case for this gene therapy that is dressed up as a vaccine. The more jabs - the more infections! This outrageous claim of it being effective has not been challenged in the report, leaving a significant gap in the narrative.


I have concluded that both the virus and the so-called vaccine remedy are lab-generated bioweapons.


Moreover, the report makes no reference to the importance of primary health measures for disease prevention. To stay healthy, you need to invest in people's health. This means access to clean air and water, warm and dry homes, fresh food that has a lot of nutrients — exercise outside, close relationships, and community support. These factors are conspicuously absent from the report.


Instead, they ignored these basics of public health while their woke media buddies, gleefully burying their snouts in the government's $50 million trough, called the Public Interest Journalism Fund, challenged Kiwi families to be the first in line for a MacDonald's meal at the end of lockdown.


Additionally, and outrageously, the government either banned, restricted, or in other ways set about discrediting off-patent medicines and herbal remedies. We later learned they had to do this to clear the way for emergency use authorisation of their novel vaccine that was neither safe nor effective.


Adding to the concerns, the experts advising the Government on its pandemic response were, quite frankly, international "lightweights" - dull and inconspicuous inhabitors of dingy back offices in ivory towers, living inconsequential, boring academic lives before their call to be the faces of COVID. These are people I would not dream of employing within my business, let alone entrusting them with the monumental task of guiding our country through a man-made pandemic.


From April 2020, I began writing a proliferation of articles about how New Zealand can escape the COVID Prison that our Government and its light-weight advisers had created for us. You can read some of them here to understand what I was talking about. I think the Government and its advisers, including the media, were harmed, wrongly informed, and misleading. They chose to place the evil and selfish interests of others before the people of New Zealand. They have hurt so many people and caused huge damage to our economy, such that they are criminals who should be charged with crimes.


While the report is a welcome step, it is sadly lacking in demonstrating "lessons learned."

Instead, it seems to be setting our beautiful and once-healthy country up for more of the same. New Zealand's COVID response was a $70 billion failure, or is it now $90 Billion? We are still spending millions on these vaccines and things like useless RATS tests. This is the biggest transfer of wealth from you and me, the hard-working taxpayers of New Zealand, to a few rich people, and with nothing good to come from it. This COVID Inquiry Report ignores this ongoing daylight robbery of the good citizens of New Zealand. This robbery threatens financial ruin for the country and for all but a handful of its people.


child with mask
Did an entire generation of children suffer damage to their mental health and cognitive abilities?

So, what now? We are told the second stage of the inquiry will address some of the concerns raised in this article. While that might be the case, the problem I have is we see the same old compromised players heading the inquiry and advising it. In addition, the report is not scheduled to be completed and tabled some time in 2026. Yes, these inquiries are complex and take time, but that is six years into the pandemic and counting and too late to influence another election cycle. Further, there will probably be another plandemic by then, with the most likely one being directed at our food production, such as from bird flu or foot-and-mouth disease. Monkey Pox and E-Bola have failed so far. Besides, who knows what they are cooking up for us in the biolabs these days? I just hope that RFK Jr spearheads a global ban on mad scientist gain-of-function research. The globalists are on the back foot and ever-desperate.


I have strong doubts about the validity of these investigations and the trustworthiness of those in power and authority, but I am becoming more hopeful. The public is becoming more aware. People are waking up to what is going on — to how they are being swindled by those they trust. Once they are aware of the situation, they cannot simply go back to being unaware — back to sleep — once awake — always awake. Maybe that is not the exact term, but the concept remains. We are destined to prevail in this situation. It is only a question of time and determination.

3 Comments


John Stickley
John Stickley
16 hours ago

Hi Gary, a great article and a big thank-you for your dedication in bringing the truth to those still in denial of what actually occurred.

I have serious doubts that phase two, the second inquiry, will bring any accountability to the individuals for their draconian authoritarian mandates.

I listened to the RCR interview with Act MP Brooke Van Velden who has been tasked to co-ordinate the second enquiry the coalition parties agreed to.

She came across as extremely naive re the expectations of those who were instrumental in part in getting NZ first back in Parliament

I believe a lot of people will be very angry and disappointed when the final report is released.

At our last Voices For Freedom…


Like

donaldasinclair
donaldasinclair
2 days ago

Great article you have just written here Gary, quite a few real home truths, yes as a old school friend who lives in Australia said to me just after their Covid report had been made public. He said that he was surrounded with "Cognitive Dissonance", but it's great to discover another foe on this subject, very much appreciated.

My daughter in the UK arranged for me to receive a book in the post late last week, its headed up " Moving Beyond the Covid-19 Lies" Restoring Health & hope for Humanity by Dr. Bryan Ardis.

We need to talk about what is in this book Gary, its mind blowing and everything he says he got the back up to prove…

Like

Philip Hayward
2 days ago

On the subject of "who are the health officials", James Delingpole always said he was horrified to see his old schoolmate Chris Whitty suddenly pop up as a power player in the junta that was handed powers in the UK during Covid. He said Whitty was an under-achieving nobody at school.

There is an old saying, "if you can't DO, then teach". Perhaps "become an official" is another career backup step even below that. Clearly the "attributes" that sort out who ends up in these official positions are completely the wrong ones the public actually needs to be serving them in a crisis. Maybe it is an appetite for paperwork, office politics and brown-nosing that does it. Meanwhile people with…


Like
bottom of page